{
 "as_of": "2026-10-31",
 "batch": 1,
 "note": "中文事实转述；以来源原文为准；不构成法律意见",
 "cases": [
  {
   "id": "C-HK-001",
   "jur": "HK",
   "year": "2019",
   "court": "香港终审法院",
   "cite": "Zhang Hong Li & Ors v DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd & Ors [2019] HKCFA（2019-11-22 判决）",
   "title_zh": "Zhang Hong Li 诉 DBS Bank（香港）——Anti-Bartlett 条款的效力",
   "tags": [
    "受托人义务",
    "家庭信托治理"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "Collas Crill 判决评述（含终院判词引文）",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.collascrill.com/articles/channel-islands-update-effectiveness-of-anti-bartlett-clauses-confirmed-1"
    },
    {
     "label": "Conyers 案件评述",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.conyers.com/publications/view/zhang-hong-li-and-others-v-dbs-bank-and-others/"
    },
    {
     "label": "STEP Journal 案例专文（含事实细节）",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.step.org/system/files/media/files/2021-10/step_journal_issue1_2020.pdf"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-HK-002",
   "jur": "HK",
   "year": "2014",
   "court": "香港终审法院",
   "cite": "Kan Lai Kwan v Poon Lok To Otto & HSBC International Trustee Ltd [2014] HKCFA 66（2014-07-17 判决）",
   "title_zh": "Kan Lai Kwan 诉 Poon Lok To Otto——家族信托资产是否计入离婚「经济来源」",
   "tags": [
    "婚姻继承与强制继承权",
    "家庭信托治理"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "ONC 律师事务所判例解读（含测试要点）",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.onc.hk/zh_CN/publication/will-trust-asset-form-part-of-financial-resources-under-the-matrimonial-proceedings-and-property-ordinance"
    },
    {
     "label": "Trusts & Trustees 期刊案例长文",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://academic.oup.com/tandt/article/21/3/285/1865647"
    },
    {
     "label": "SCMP 报道（判决金额）",
     "grade": "C",
     "url": "https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1555849/hk766-m-divorce-payout-ex-wife-leading-engineer-otto-poon"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-GB-001",
   "jur": "GB",
   "year": "2007",
   "court": "英格兰及威尔士上诉法院",
   "cite": "Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 502（2007-05-24 判决）",
   "title_zh": "Charman 诉 Charman——离岸家族信托在离婚中的「资源」认定",
   "tags": [
    "婚姻继承与强制继承权",
    "家庭信托治理"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "Family Law 判决评述（含上诉院说理）",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/the-court-of-appeal-decision-in-charman-v-charman"
    },
    {
     "label": "卫报报道",
     "grade": "C",
     "url": "http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,2087913,00.html"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-GG-001",
   "jur": "GG",
   "year": "2018",
   "court": "枢密院（自根西上诉）",
   "cite": "Investec Trust (Guernsey) Ltd v Glenalla Properties Ltd [2018] UKPC 7（2018-04-23 判决）",
   "title_zh": "Investec Trust（根西）诉 Glenalla——受托人对第三人的责任边界",
   "tags": [
    "受托人义务",
    "跨境申报"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "英国国家档案馆枢密院判决全文",
     "grade": "A",
     "url": "https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukpc/2018/7/data.pdf"
    },
    {
     "label": "Serle Court 判决评述",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.serlecourt.co.uk/privy-council-hands-down-its-advice-in-long-running-guernsey-litigation-inv"
    },
    {
     "label": "Collas Crill 判决评述",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.collascrill.com/articles/investec-v-glenalla-privy-council-defines-the-limits-of-a-trustees-liability-and-the-rights-of-creditors/"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-JE-001",
   "jur": "JE",
   "year": "2007",
   "court": "泽西皇家法院",
   "cite": "Alhamrani v Alhamrani [2007] JRC 026；另有 [2007] JRC 012 等系列判决",
   "title_zh": "Alhamrani 诉 Alhamrani——「狗腿索赔」被拒与受托人费用从信托资产支付的规则",
   "tags": [
    "受托人义务"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "Mondaq 五案系列评述",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.mondaq.com/jersey/trusts/49256/dog-leg-claims-and-trustees-legal-costs"
    },
    {
     "label": "BAILII 相关判决原文（Landau v Landau 引述 Alhamrani 规则）",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://beta.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/2007/2007_084.html"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-VG-001",
   "jur": "VG",
   "year": "2026",
   "court": "东加勒比最高法院 BVI 商事法庭",
   "cite": "NMH & ATG v PWP & NKT, BVIHC (COM) 2023/0064（2026-03 判决，ECSC J0305-1）",
   "title_zh": "NMH 诉 PWP——BVI「防火墙」条款：BVI 公司股份上的信托按 BVI 法定效力",
   "tags": [
    "受益人保护与披露",
    "跨境申报"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "Bedell Cristin 判决评述（含第 83A 条文梳理）",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.bedellcristin.com/knowledge/articles/2023/firewall-legislation-in-the-bvi/"
    },
    {
     "label": "Mourant（Lexology）判决评述",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6a444708-ba5e-4ab7-a69a-dc20a3e0c9cd"
    },
    {
     "label": "新浪财经中文案情详解",
     "grade": "C",
     "url": "https://cj.sina.cn/articles/view/5953189932/162d6782c06704ysl0"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-SG-001",
   "jur": "SG",
   "year": "2009",
   "court": "新加坡上诉法院",
   "cite": "Ng Eng Ghee & Ors v Mamata Kapildev Dave & Ors [2009] SGCA 14（2009-04-02 判决）",
   "title_zh": "Ng Eng Ghee 诉 Mamata Kapildev Dave——「准受托人」义务清单的权威表述",
   "tags": [
    "受托人义务"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "新加坡 eLitigation 判决原文",
     "grade": "A",
     "url": "https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2009_SGCA_14"
    },
    {
     "label": "Legal Wires 案例评述",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://legal-wires.com/singapore/ng-eng-ghee-and-others-v-mamata-kapildev-dave-and-others-horizon-partners-pte-ltd-intervener-and-another-appeal-5/"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-US-001",
   "jur": "US",
   "year": "1971",
   "court": "美国联邦最高法院",
   "cite": "United States v. Byrum, 402 U.S. 451 (1971)（1971-06-14 判决）",
   "title_zh": "United States v. Byrum——保留投票权是否构成遗产税「保留享受」",
   "tags": [
    "信托税制",
    "婚姻继承与强制继承权"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "Justia 判决原文库",
     "grade": "A",
     "url": "https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/451/"
    },
    {
     "label": "异议意见全文（Wikisource）",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://en.wikisource.com/wiki/United_States_v._Byrum/Dissent_White"
    },
    {
     "label": "Revisiting Byrum（学术论文，含被立法推翻的后续）",
     "grade": "B",
     "url": "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=516562"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-CN-001",
   "jur": "CN",
   "year": "2023",
   "court": "重庆市第五中级人民法院",
   "cite": "（2022）渝05破申…受理；2023-05-26 裁定宣告破产；入选重庆法院 2023 年度十大典型案件",
   "title_zh": "新华信托破产清算——全国首例信托公司破产",
   "tags": [
    "机构风险与处置"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "重庆法院官网·2023 年度十大典型案件（含裁判理由与专家点评）",
     "grade": "A",
     "url": "http://cqgy.cqfygzfw.gov.cn/article/detail/2024/08/id/8050689.shtml"
    },
    {
     "label": "央广网报道（时间线与评估数据）",
     "grade": "C",
     "url": "https://news.cnr.cn/native/gd/20230528/t20230528_526266765.shtml"
    },
    {
     "label": "中国证券网报道",
     "grade": "C",
     "url": "https://www.cnstock.com/commonDetail/21657"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "C-CN-002",
   "jur": "CN",
   "year": "2026",
   "court": "黑龙江省哈尔滨市中级人民法院",
   "cite": "黑01破申7号（2026-07-03 裁定受理）；金监局黑龙江监管局黑金监复〔2026〕34号批复",
   "title_zh": "中融信托破产清算——第二家进入破产程序的信托公司",
   "tags": [
    "机构风险与处置"
   ],
   "sources": [
    {
     "label": "腾讯新闻转载（含裁定书主要内容与监管批复文号）",
     "grade": "C",
     "url": "https://view.inews.qq.com/a/20260704A030WS00"
    },
    {
     "label": "商业新知报道（股东结构与时间线）",
     "grade": "C",
     "url": "https://www.shangyexinzhi.com/article/32891636.html"
    }
   ]
  }
 ]
}